A piece for Disquiet Junto 0607 .
My thoughts went like this.
We cannot be 40% silent at a single point in time, so we have to define the amount of silence at a point in terms of the sound that is happening around that point. I chose to define the percentage of silence at a point in time as the percentage of silence (time with zero amplitude) in a 14 second interval centered at that point in time.
Also, it seems to me that we do not actually hear silence unless it is of sufficient length (e.g., we do not hear “silence” when there is a 0.001 second gap in a sound). For this piece, I defined silence to be an interval of at least 0.5 seconds of zero amplitude. I could see an argument for requiring longer gaps than this, though, since with short “silences”, I feel that we are still hearing the sound that came before it, and not actually hearing the silence.
So then I randomly threw 25000 sound events onto a 5 minute span of silence, checking before each one that the percentage of sound at that point would not go above that required by the instructions (i.e., a linear increase from 0 to 40% sound at the midpoint and linearly back to zero for the second half).
The sound events are guitar samples I’ve made, pitched and filtered in various ways. There are many points where the samples “pile up” and make a noticeably louder occurrence; this happens because once a sound has been placed, another sound can be placed “on top” of it, with no reduction in the amount of silence.
It was fun coding this, and I’ve grown to like the result after numerous tweeks and re-listens.